Futures Movers: Oil price sinks as talks continue over Russia price-cap plan

This post was originally published on this site

Oil futures traded sharply lower Wednesday as investors kept tabs on Group of Seven talks on a price cap for Russian oil.

The U.S. and its allies could agree on a price cap for the warring nation’s crude, The Wall Street Journal reported, with officials discussing a level around $60 a barrel. The cap still could be set as high as $70, according to the report.

Price action
  • West Texas Intermediate crude for January delivery
    CL.1,
    -4.19%

    CL00,
    -4.19%

    CLF23,
    -4.19%

    fell $3.77, or 4.6%, to $77.19 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

  • January Brent crude
    BRNF23,
    -3.94%
    ,
    the global benchmark, was down $3.82, or 4.3%, at $84.55 a barrel on ICE Futures Europe, while February Brent
    BRN00,
    -3.53%

    BRNG23,
    -3.53%
    ,
    the most actively traded contract, was off $3.44, or 3.9%, at $84.26 a barrel.

  • Back on Nymex, December gasoline
    RBZ22,
    -4.16%

    fell 4.1% to $2.4364 a gallon, while December heating oil
    HOZ22,
    -3.09%

    was down 2.8% at $3.3746 a gallon.

  • December natural gas
    NGZ22,
    +6.42%

    jumped 7.9% to $7.319 per million British thermal units.

Market drivers

The Journal said U.S. officials want to set the cap high enough to provide Russia incentive to keep selling crude on to the global market, with prewar prices of around $65 a barrel for Russian crude seen as a potential benchmark. Russian oil has traded at around a $26 a barrel discount to Brent in recent days, the report said, citing Refinitiv data.

Bloomberg reports that the average price of Urals oil from October 15 to November 14 was $71.10 a barrel, with global oil prices sliding significantly since then. 

“The higher the price cap, the easier it will be for buyers in India and China to access shipping, insurance and other services from Group of Seven nations,” said analysts at Mizuho in a daily report, stressing that is the intent of the G-7 intervention.

Because production costs are estimated at around $20 per barrel, the cap would still make it profitable for Russia to sell its oil and in this way prevent a supply shortage on the global market. A senior U.S. Treasury official said on Tuesday that the price cap will probably be adjusted a few times a year, Reuters reported.

Oil remains rangebound “between $78 and $93 (on a closing basis) with Russia’s response to the European Union and G-7 policies a bullish wild card to watch in early December,” said analysts at Sevens Report Research, in a Wednesday note.

“At this time, Russia has said they will not sell oil to any nation cooperating with the price cap and the impact of that on global markets is unclear,” they added.

The analyst group said such a plan could have limited market impact if Russia continues to sell oil to China and India if the G-7 are successful in getting those two nations on board with the cap.

If so, “Russia may just cut exports and store oil causing a potential bullish supply-side shock to the market,” the Sevens Report commentary said. “The next two weeks in the oil markets are unlikely to be dull.”

The Russian cap news added to demand concerns around China that have persisted over several trading sessions. China, among the world’s largest energy users, has been grappling with a surge in COVID-19 cases. Shanghai tightened some rules on public life late on Tuesday.

An OECD economic outlook that predicted a slowdown in global economic expansion next year also added to downside pressure.

The global economy should avoid a recession next year but the worst energy crisis since the 1970s will trigger a sharp slowdown, the OECD said Tuesday. The group expects Europe to be hardest hit and stressed fighting inflation is policymakers’ top priority.

Meanwhile, official data from the Energy Information Administration showed a 3.7 million barrel draw in crude inventories. U.S. gasoline stocks rose by 3.1 million barrels, according to the EIA.

Analysts surveyed by The Wall Street Journal, on average, had looked for crude supplies to fall by 800,000 barrels, while gasoline supplies were expected to show a drop of 200,000 barrels.

Rachel Koning Beals contributed to this report.