This post was originally published on this site
https://i-invdn-com.investing.com/trkd-images/LYNXNPEI430TK_L.jpgThe request indicates that Jordan may investigate the FTC’s merger review.
Jordan expressed concern about statements by the Open Markets Institute, which he called “an extreme left-wing political advocacy organization,” and its call for the FTC to stop the deal.
“We are concerned that OMI – where you were previously employed as Legal Director – may be trying to leverage its close relationship with you to take action to further limit free speech online,” wrote Jordan.
FTC Chair Lina Khan was legal director from 2017-2018 at the OMI, which describes itself on its website as working “to address threats to our democracy, individual liberties, and our national security from today’s unprecedented levels of corporate concentration and monopoly power.”
Jordan has backed Musk’s purchase of Twitter in hopes that some conservatives, like former President Donald Trump, who were removed from the social media platform would be able to return.
The OMI issued a statement https://www.openmarketsinstitute.org/publications/open-markets-details-how-us-government-can-block-musk-takeover-of-twitter?rq=twitter last month on how it said the government could block the purchase of Twitter.
There is little expectation that Musk’s potential purchase of Twitter will be rejected by antitrust enforcers.
The FTC is reportedly investigating Musk’s initial purchase of a 9% stake in Twitter, probing whether he complied with an antitrust reporting requirement when he acquired the shares in early April.
The FTC acknowledged receiving Jordan’s letter but declined further comment. Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), the electric vehicle company of which Musk is CEO, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The OMI could not be reached immediately for comment.
Musk, the world’s richest man and an active and opinionated Twitter user, clinched a deal to buy Twitter for $44 billion cash in late April.