This post was originally published on this site
In a week in which BlackRock swore off coal stocks, attention is growing on companies that meet so-called environmental, social and governance criteria.
Investing in these stocks is so trendy that U.S. flows into such funds nearly quadrupled last year.
Those flows however still haven’t skewed valuations.
Nicolas Rabener, a managing director at FactorResearch, examined exchange-traded funds with ESG screens.
FactorResearch found ESG funds are cheaper than growth stocks but more expensive than value stocks.
Top stocks in these funds include Microsoft MSFT, -0.06%, Ecolab ECL, +0.53% and ACN, +0.29% .
Troubled bank Wells Fargo WFC, -0.88%, plane maker Boeing BA, -0.90% and missile producer Lockheed Martin LMT, -0.14% are among the companies not represented in these ESG funds.
Related: Microsoft aims to be ‘carbon negative’ by 2030
He found that ESG ETFs, when looking at weighted-average and median price-to-equity ratios, are just slightly more expensive than the U.S. market.
This shouldn’t be a surprise since they tend to be overweight pricier technology and consumer discretionary stocks. They are cheaper than growth stocks overall.
While they’re not pricy, ESG ETFs do not seem to do a good job of screening out companies engaging in bad behavior before they get caught, he said.
After aggregating ESG ETFs into an equal-weighted index, they underperform the S&P 1500 since 2005. This indicates that ESG scores, similar to credit ratings, are unlikely to have predictive power for identifying corporate behavior that will lead to relative underperformance, he said.
